Twitter Icon

Quantumaniac is where it’s at - and by ‘it’ I mean awesome.

Over here I post a ton of physics / math / general interesting posts in an attempt to make your brain feel good. I try to be as informative as possible, all while posting fascinating things that hopefully enlighten us both a little to the mysteries of our truly wondrous universe(s?). Plus, how would you know if the blog exists or not unless you observe it? Boom, just pulled the Schrödinger’s cat card. Now you have to check it out - trust me, it said so in an equation somewhere.

Photobucket

Follow Quora

 

The Brontosaurus Never Existed

Think of dinosaurs, and a few specific creatures inevitably come to mind -a T. Rex, maybe a Velociraptor, and probably a Brontosaurus as well. The Brontosauruses, due to their daunting size and impressive likeness, have been portrayed on TV and in films for decades. However, scientifically speaking - they don’t exist. While these long-necked dinosaurs exist in our culture, science abandoned them long ago, as the name is considered a junior (albeit redundant) synonym of the Apatosaurus. 

According to Matt Lamanna, curator of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History in Pittsburgh, the scientific community has known that the Brontosaurus was a fictitious dinosaur for more than a hundred years. But as with some popular trends, the Brontosaurus remained a cultural fixture until this very day. 

Lamanna said the story of Brontosaurus dates back over a century, to a period known as the Bone Wars. This early period of paleontology in the US saw a wealth of new dinosaur fossils being discovered, with Othniel Charles Marsh and Edward Drinker Cope at the forefront of most discoveries. The feud between them was called the Bone Wars, as they were frequently trying to outdo one another. 

“There are stories of either Cope or Marsh telling their fossil collectors to smash skeletons that were still in the ground, just so the other guy couldn’t get them,” Lamanna said in a detailed interview with Guy Raz of NPR’s All Things Considered. “It was definitely a bitter, bitter rivalry.”

It was this heated race to get dinosaurs published that led to the unwarranted naming of the Brontosaurus. In 1877, Marsh, who had discovered numerous dinosaur fossils, discovered the partial skeleton of a long-necked, long-tailed, herbivorous dinosaur he dubbed Apatosaurus. Since the fossil was missing a skull, in 1883 when he published a reconstruction of his Apatosaurus, he borrowed a skull from another dinosaur — possibly a Camarasaurus — to complete the skeleton.

A few years later his fossil collectors had sent Marsh a second skeleton he believed to belong to a completely new dinosaur, which he named Brontosaurus, according to Lamanna.

However, this new dinosaur was actually a more complete Apatosaurus. And in Marsh’s rush to outdo Cope, he carelessly mistook the dinosaur for something new, Lamanna added.

The dinosaur mistake was eventually spotted by scientists in 1903, but for some reason, the Brontosaurus named lived on in popular culture and children’s imaginations everywhere. It was not until another 67 years, in 1970, when two Carnegie researchers took a second look at the controversy and determined, once and for all, the Brontosaurus was a fictional-only dinosaur.

This conclusion was met due to a dinosaur skull discovered in Utah in 1910 that was correctly attributed to the Apatosaurus rather than Marsh’s defunct Brontosaurus.

“Brontosaurus means ‘thunder lizard,’” he said. “It’s a big, evocative name, whereas Apatosaurus means ‘deceptive lizard.’ It’s quite a bit more boring.”

Sources: RedOrbitNPR

Image Sources: 1, 2

  1. paigeshomeforimaginaryfriends reblogged this from quantumaniac
  2. moss-piglets reblogged this from quantumaniac
  3. teen-stuff-at-the-library reblogged this from ladystormcrow
  4. bolinhas-amarelas reblogged this from joycejamie
  5. joycejamie reblogged this from freedomscreams
  6. octowuss reblogged this from fyeahpaleontology
  7. fossils-and-bones reblogged this from fyeahpaleontology
  8. ladystormcrow reblogged this from awesomemodon
  9. awesomemodon reblogged this from fyeahpaleontology
  10. fyeahpaleontology reblogged this from paleokid and added:
    (Related Post)
  11. drownmeinmywarmbed reblogged this from quantumaniac
  12. rotlew reblogged this from scinerds
  13. clndstnkim reblogged this from dustoffyourshoes
  14. dustoffyourshoes reblogged this from amandantory
  15. amandantory reblogged this from abbytheanthrophile and added:
    This crushes me
  16. clarissasauter reblogged this from scinerds
  17. wereasinkingship reblogged this from quantumaniac
  18. dirtylittlewanker reblogged this from mymentalconfessional
  19. mymentalconfessional reblogged this from scinerds
  20. openeyestothingsunseen reblogged this from rebelion-silenciosa
  21. amoebamike reblogged this from scinerds
  22. palaeontology reblogged this from quantumaniac
  23. pokebolaaa reblogged this from rebelion-silenciosa
  24. homieswan reblogged this from rebelion-silenciosa
  25. rebelion-silenciosa reblogged this from meddiv
  26. meddiv reblogged this from chaddyville
  27. hazny182 reblogged this from quantumaniac
  28. tea2thebag reblogged this from mega-steve
  29. k-a-p-o-w reblogged this from quantumaniac
  30. chaddyville reblogged this from thoughtsfromatwistedmind and added:
    The creationists would have a field day with this. Lol.
  31. thoughtsfromatwistedmind reblogged this from voicefoundwords